On the other manus. Philippine Air Lines Inc. They assert that Artigo did absolutely nothing during the second negotiation but to sign as a witness in the deed of sale. It is to be noted also that while Constante was too particular about the unrenewed real estate brokers license of Mr.
The couple got married on the same date, with Judge Jose C. For these violations, petitioner was again made to explain. Provided, That the Ancestral Domains Office shall reject any claim that is deemed patently false or fraudulent after inspection and verification: At the outset, it is evident from the errors assigned that the petition is anchored on a plea to review the factual conclusion reached by the respondent court.
Minor The dismissed of an International flight air hostess from her occupation by ground of her catching matrimony. Carpio, and Del Castillo, JJ. Petitioners alleged that with the advent of Republic Act No. The complainant argued that the policy is a favoritism against married adult females. Sandiganbayan, SCRA 72 This applies to all enlisting.
It should promote a positive equal opportunities environment and applies on a timely manner. Hernandez, 18 SCRA . Minor 1 To reinstate the discharged air hostess. PAL invoked its policy which stated that flight attenders must be individual. On March 20,a national inventory of the contents of the warehouse was conducted, and the result tallied with the number reflected in the Daily Stock Situation Report DSSR that was prepared by petitioner.
Having found a buyer for the two lots, Artigo had already performed his part of the bargain under the contract of agency. Our pronouncement in the case of Cormero vs. Thus, it concludes the trial court correctly held that the marriage between petitioner and respondent is not valid.
Respondent conducted further investigation and discovered other irregularities allegedly committed by petitioner. Nevertheless, after the ceremony, petitioner and respondent went back to their respective homes and did not live together as husband and wife.
There was no participation of the State, through the prosecuting attorney or fiscal, to see to it that there is no collusion between the parties, as required by the Family Code in actions for declaration of nullity of a marriage. Under the terms of the collective bargaining agreements entered into between the parties from up to September 8,which were the subject matter of L and L, off-days were not paid days.
As the Court held in Paduran v. Further, these letters covered only the first negotiations between Constante and Times Transit which failed; hence, these are immaterial in determining the final purchase price.
After it became clear that his demands for payment have fallen on deaf ears, Artigo decided to sue on May 29, The false affidavit which petitioner and respondent executed so they could push through with the marriage has no value whatsoever; it is a mere scrap of paper.
A spot count was conducted by petitioner, together with Rollie Latosa Logistics Coordinatora representative from the third party logistics service provider referred to as the 3PLand the assigned salesman.
A contract of agency which is not contrary to law, public order, public policy, morals or good custom is a valid contract, and constitutes the law between the parties.
In its Decision dated 16 October5 the trial court ruled that the marriage between petitioner and respondent is not valid because it was solemnized without a marriage license. Claudine De Castro Zialcita should be reinstate as air hostess because PAL statements that a married flight air hostess hazards going pregnant and disconcerting flight agendas was non a valid ground.
This prompted the trial court to observe:. 1PART ONE: PRELIMINARY PROVISIONS CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS ON LABOR Article II, Section 18 “The State affi.
For resolution is the petition for review on certiorari filed by petitioner, Arnold F. Anib, assailing the Court of Appeals (CA) Resolution  dated March 18, and Minute Resolution dated April 29, On March 3,petitioner was employed as helper by respondent, Coca-Cola Bottlers Philippines, Inc. Hence, the method of computing the basic and hourly rate of respondent PAL's monthly-salaried employees which We decreed in G.R.
No. L and No. L is no longer applicable after September 8, 1 2.
in an action for Judicial Partition of Real Property thereat commenced by the herein petitioner Lupo Atienza against respondent Yolanda de Castro.: Assailed and sought to be set aside in this petition for review on certiorari is the Decision1 dated April Hence, the method of computing the basic and hourly rate of respondent PAL's monthly-salaried employees which We decreed in G.R.
No. L and No. L is no longer applicable after September 8, I. Title of the Case Stipulation Against Marriage Claudine de Castro Zialcita vs.
Philippine Airlines (PAL) II. View Point Claudine de Castro Zialcita complained against Philippine Airlines (PAL) for disregarding her from her occupation by ground of .Claudine de castro zialcita vs pal respondent